Chelsea remains second after West Ham draw
Soccer Betting Lines
12/14/2008 -
London, England (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Chelsea missed out on a chance to take over
the Premiership lead on Sunday as the Blues were held to a 1-1 draw by West
Ham at Stamford Bridge.
League-leaders Liverpool entered the weekend with a one-point lead on Chelsea,
but after finishing 2-2 with Hull City on Saturday, the Reds were in danger of
dropping to second if Chelsea could beat the Hammers.
However, Craig Bellamy fired the visitors ahead in the 33rd minute and Chelsea
could only pull level early in the second half through Nicolas Anelka.
After being the most dominant side at home in England, Chelsea has now won
just three of its nine home contests this season, and dropping more points at
home against a bottom-half side is more evidence that Stamford Bridge is not
quite the fortress it once was.
Chelsea started brightly with Joe Cole getting into the box on the right and
firing a shot towards goal from eight yards that was deflected just past the
upper right corner.
However, Mark Noble won the ball near the end line from Chelsea's Jose
Bosingwa, and although he appeared to use his arm to control the ball, the
referee saw nothing wrong, allowing Noble to find Bellamy inside the box.
The striker took the ball down off his chest and fired a volley inside the
near post, putting his team ahead.
It didn't take Chelsea long to level the match after halftime as substitute
Didier Drogba dropped a pass to Frank Lampard at the top of the box and
Lampard lobbed it over the top to Anelka, who fired home his 100th goal in
Premiership play.
West Ham goalkeeper Robert Green made a good reaction stop on a header from
Alex with 11 minutes to play, but it was West Ham that almost stole the points
in stoppage time as Petr Cech did well to keep out a low shot from Carlton
Cole.
Sunday's other match saw Newcastle earn three vital points as the Magpies put
together a 3-0 win over Portsmouth. After a scoreless first half Newcastle
fired home three goals with Michael Owen, Obafemi Martins and Danny Guthrie
providing the tallies.
Newcastle moves up to 14th in a crowded bottom half of the table with the win,
while Pompey remains in eighth place.
<< Thrashers send Stuart to Chicago
Chicago, IL (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Atlanta Thrashers have reassigned left
winger Colin Stuart to the Chicago Wolves of the American Hockey League.
Stuart has recorded three goals and five points in 19 NHL contests with
Atlanta ov
<< Smolenak reassigned to Norfolk
Tampa Bay, FL (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Tampa Bay Lightning reassigned forward
Radek Smolenak to their American Hockey League affiliate, the Norfolk
Admirals, it was announced on Sunday.
Smolenak skated in six games with the Ligh
<< 'Canes send Rodney to Albany
Raleigh, NC (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Carolina Hurricanes reassigned defenseman
Bryan Rodney to their American Hockey League affiliate, the Albany River Rats,
it was announced on Sunday.
The 24-year-old Rodney played in two games during his fi
<< Ottawa sends Bass to Binghamton
Ottawa, ON (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Ottawa Senators returned center Cody Bass to
their American Hockey League affiliate, the Binghamton Senators, it was
announced on Sunday.
Since his second recall of the season on Dec. 1, Bass play
<< Nine-man Schalke holds on for draw with Hoffenheim
Sinsheim, Germany (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Schalke earned a 1-1 draw with Hoffenheim
at Carl Benz Stadion on Sunday despite playing the final 10 minutes of the
game with only nine men.
Gerald Asamoah put Schalke ahead 40 minutes into the game
Leafs send Stralman down to Marlies >>
Nashville, TN (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Toronto Maple Leafs assigned defenseman
Anton Stralman to the Toronto Marlies of the American Hockey League it was
announced on Sunday.
Stralman has played in 21 games for the Maple Leafs, record
NHL Atlantic: Devils thriving without Brodeur >>
(Sportsbook Betting Lines) - When the news arrived in early November that New Jersey's
franchise goaltender Martin Brodeur was going to miss three-to-four months of
action, many believed that a death knell had sounded for the Devils' 2009
playoff chances
Stars send Jancevski to Hamilton >>
Dallas, TX (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Dallas Stars reassigned defenseman Dan
Jancevski to the Hamilton Bulldogs of the American Hockey League, it was
announced on Sunday.
The 27-year-old Jancevski has played in 25 games with th
Rangers recall Potter from Hartford >>
New York, NY (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The New York Rangers recalled defenseman
Corey Potter from the Hartford Wolf Pack of the American Hockey League, it was
announced on Sunday.
Potter, 24, has registered two goals and nine assists in
Moose send Gendur back down >>
Winnipeg, MB (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Manitoba Moose re-assigned forward Dan
Gendur to the Victoria Salmon Kings of the ECHL, the American Hockey League
club announced on Sunday.
The 21-year-old Gendur appeared in two games with th
NFL owners, already life's biggest winners, want to try their luck with the lottery.
That was the news out of their meetings last week, where team bosses voted unanimously to allow stamping state and local lottery tickets with franchise logos, if, ahem, any governments wanted to do a deal.
A shocker: Within days the Pats announced they'd be sponsoring the Massachusetts state lottery, the Skins said they'd slap their sticker on Virginia scratch-offs and the Ravens admitted they were talking to Maryland lottery bosses. In all likelihood, it won't be long before every team is a presenting sponsor of scratch-offs or just plain old pick fives. "The change in policy was approved 32-0," said NFL spokesman Greg Aiello. "So you can expect to see more deals soon."
It's a branding opportunity too big for the owners to ignore, and one a couple of dozen baseball franchises have enjoyed for years. The fact the NFL has been slower to act than those slack-brained Seligites is indicative of its complicated relationship with all forms of gambling. Consider this: Last Thursday, as the Pats and the Redskins finalized their new lottery deals, a lawyer representing the NFL argued before Delaware's Supreme Court that the state's newly signed sports betting law should be repealed.
The NFL betting is the face of opposition to sports gambling . And as much as it would like to share that responsibility with other leagues, that's not going to happen as long as more than 40% of all money legally wagered on games is bet on football. That's why the Brewers can do a multi-million dollar deal with a local casino, or the Celtics can make their own pact with the Mass lottery, and the response is, "Sweet, let's play." But when the NFL does it the stakes are higher, and everyone from NPR's Frank Deford to the Associated Press to the guys blogging at Deadspin will line up to play gotcha.
So I asked Aiello, who surely knew there'd be piling on, how the league can rail against being bait for sports bettors, then allow its franchises to be just that for lotteries, the most insidious and addictive form of gambling around. He emailed me this response: "We are not moral crusaders. NFL personnel are permitted to engage in legal forms of gambling, except for betting on NFL games. We are making a distinction here between the spread of gambling on the outcome of our games and supporting state lottery scratch-off games, that have nothing to do with the outcome of our games."
Here's where I should rip him. But, the thing is, he's right. Not to get Obama on you, but this is a complicated, nuanced issue. As much as lotteries are considered a tax on the poor, the NFL isn't a socially obligated government program -- it's just a business. Scratch-off's help the bottom line, sports betting doesn't.
Now, it's okay to call the league hypocritical when it releases injury reports, which players have told me only helps bettors … But when it supports other forms of gaming? Big Deal.
Now, it's okay to call the league hypocritical when it releases injury reports, which players have told me only helps bettors. And it's okay to mutter something obscene when the league pretends gambling doesn't help drive TV ratings and fan interest and put money in owners' pockets. But when it supports other forms of gaming? Big Deal. The Bears should put an orange "C" on every deck of cards dealt at Harrah's in Joliet; the Eagles should slap their logo on roulette wheels at the Borgata in Atlantic City; the Dolphins should hold training camp at the El San Juan in Puerto Rico.
Seriously.
The NFL's problem, when it comes to the gambling world, isn't hypocrisy, it's worse: The bosses lack vision. That's why the league is picking unwinnable fights in Delaware and taking pot shots from critics after making smart sponsorship deals. Roger Goodell and his gang are acting and thinking locally rather than globally, which is rare for them, especially compared to their professional (and amateur) counterparts.
The NBA held its All Star game in Las Vegas and David Stern's kingdom didn't crumble (although the town did bring plenty of players to their knees.) I'd say it's 6 to 5 and pick 'em that Lebron will make a road swing through Sin City before his career is over.
Even the NCAA College Football Betting is more progressive on this issue than the NFL. Several years ago Rachel Newman Baker, college sports' gambling czar, opened a dialogue with Vegas bookmakers to learn about how they do business. She's visited Nevada sports books, studied their operations and listened to how they regulate action. Now she knows she can expect a call from bookmakers, who lose money when sports are fixed, if they think something sketchy is going on in NCAA games. She's not in favor of sports betting, but, as she once told me, "I know it's not going away, either."
The NFL can't seem to accept that. And until it can find peace with the idea, it'll get flack, even when it's right.
To visit this online sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com for all your Sportsbook accepts MasterCard needs.
There is little doubt that the NFL is where the sportsbooks see the most action and also make the most loot. The NFL possesses betting friendly attributes that are unlike any of the other major sports. First off, there are relatively few teams to keep track of in comparison to college football betting or college basketball. And second, these teams play only once a week which makes staying on top of the results much easier than it is in the daily leagues such as the NBA, NHL, and MLB.
These dynamics, along with the sheer excitement of watching and wagering on football, brings more square action to the table than any of the other sports. Almost every Tom, Dick and Harry in America is an NFL expert in their own mind and that is precisely what the oddsmakers prey upon.
Understanding who bets the games is just as important as understanding which teams are playing the games. The market at times will dictate price, which in the betting world means the oddsmakers cater to the public rather than reality.
Knowing the market inside and out is the basis of our NFL handicapping model. That is, our approach to NFL handicapping is of the contrarian or value seeking variety. We will at times place a higher premium on public sentiment than on the fundamentals. This strategy dictates playing dogs and/or lesser competent teams, or teams the public wants nothing to do with. Or better yet, fading the teams the oddsmakers want you to bet on.
Along these same lines, we carry a similar notion that the first week of the NFL season presents one of the ripest opportunities for the astute gambler. This conflicts with conventional wisdom and/or handicapping lore, as most would say it is better to watch a few games and assess each team before jumping in with both feet. That’s all fine and dandy, but there are some interesting trends to exploit in Week 1 and we’d be remiss to ignore them. Let us quickly explain.
Gone are the days of dynasties, where the same core players stay intact and dominate the league year after year. Free agency and player movements can completely transform teams from one season to the next. In today’s parity-driven NFL, poor teams typically don’t stay poor for all that long and excellent teams must constantly reinvent themselves to stay on top.
The temptation might be to assume prior year results are the best indicator of who is going to cover in Week 1. To Joe Public, playoff teams from the prior season, home teams, favorites, and so one, look even more enticing than usual since there is no current season performance to judge them against. But the question begs: are the oddsmakers setting a trap?
To find the answer, we culled five years worth of Week 1 NFL data. As always, all of our analysis is done from an ATS perspective. The purpose here is to share the most important angles we unearthed and try to explain the logic behind them. So strap on your helmet, throw on your shoulder pads, and follow our lead as we expose some rare holes in the oddsmakers’ line of defense.
Home vs. Away Teams
Over the past five seasons, NFL home teams in Week 1 are just 31-42-7 ATS (42 percent). This of course implies that roadies are a 58 percent winning proposition during this time. The public at large has a tendency to overvalue home teams and this is especially true in Week 1 when there is no current season data to make predictions from. Consequently, the oddsmakers almost surely shade the home teams, by and large making road teams the choice for the value player.
Conclusion: Look long and hard at road teams first when handicapping the opening week.
Price ranges
Favorites are just 31-42-7 ATS (42 percent) in the opening week over the past five NFL seasons (Coincidentally, home teams hold the same ATS record as noted above). This means that underdogs bark at a 58 percent clip. Mid-range favorites performed the worst among our specified price ranges. In particular, favorites priced between –3 1/2 and –6 1/2 are only 8-15 ATS (35 percent) during this time.
The same basic pattern holds true when looking at home favorites (road favorites gravitate towards a 50 percent mean). Home favorites indeed are just 21-32-3 ATS (40 percent) in the first week of NFL action since 1999. Again, mid-range favorites are similarly the poorest performers when we look at home teams. Consider that home teams priced between –3 1/2 and –6 1/2 have stumbled to a 6-13 ATS (32 percent) mark in Week 1 games the past five seasons.
Conclusion: Like home teams, favorites and particularly mid-range favorites are generally overvalued in Week 1.
Playoff teams
It might surprise you to learn that playoff teams from the prior year versus non-playoff teams from the prior year are a mere 16-23-3 (41 percent) ATS in NFL Week 1 games over the past five seasons. Home teams which made the playoffs versus teams which did not make the playoffs from the prior season drop to a meager 7-14-1 ATS (33 percent) during this time.
Why are playoff teams, and in particular those at home, such bad bets the past five openers? Just as the case with home teams and with favorites, oddsmakers intentionally overprice playoff teams in the opening week to compensate for the public’s propensity to over bet them.
This theory holds true just looking at straight-up records from the past season as well. That is, home teams with winning records from the prior season vs. road teams with losing records from the prior season are just 8-13 ATS in Week 1 NFL games since 1999.
Conclusion: Playoff teams from the prior year and in particular, home playoff teams, are overvalued in Week 1 NFL games.
Scoring defense and scoring offense
Do good defenses and for that matter good offenses from the prior season fare better against the number the following year in Week 1 games? Well, sort of. Generally speaking, teams with a solid offense or defense from the prior season tend to do well in the opening week so long as they are on the road. As a host, however, the best offenses and best defenses from the prior year tend to be overvalued in Week 1.
Consider that the top five scoring defenses (i.e. points allowed) from the prior season are a nice 8-4 ATS (66 percent) on the road in NFL openers the past five seasons. Meanwhile, the top five scoring defenses from the prior season are just 3-8-2 ATS (27 percent) as a host in Week 1 during the same time period.
There is no discernable advantage or disadvantage for teams with a top five scoring offense (i.e. points scored) in Week 1 games. However, when we look at scoring offenses from the bottom up (isolating the five worst offenses from the prior season), the results are rather interesting. In particular, teams ranked in the bottom five in scoring offense from the prior season are 9-4-1 ATS (69 percent) when on the road in Week 1.
The logic is simply that the public perception is a poor scoring offensive unit from the year prior will have little chance of winning on the road in Week 1. In turn, the oddsmakers compensate for this perception and these poor offensive teams from the year prior carry extra line value on the Week 1 trail.
Conclusion: Teams with top-ranked defenses from the previous season are good bets when playing on the road, but poor bets when playing at home. Also, teams ranked among the bottom five in scoring offense from the prior season are generally a good value in their Week 1 openers, provided they are playing on the road.
Scoring margin
An exceedingly straightforward way of measuring scoring offense and scoring defense together as a whole is to look at a team's “margin." Margin is simply scoring offense minus scoring defense, which is a fairly clear-cut measure of how a team does on both sides of the ball. Typically, the higher the margin, the better the team.
In this regard, it might seem counterintuitive that teams carrying the higher margin from the prior season in week one matchups are merely 31-42-7 ATS (42 percent). Furthermore, road teams with the higher margin are 14-20-6 ATS (41 percent), while home teams with the higher margin are 17-22-1 ATS (44 percent). Once again, these results line up with the theory that better teams from the prior year are overvalued come opening day of the following season.
Conclusion: “Better” teams, which often boast a higher margin than their opponent, are overvalued the following season in NFL openers.
In sum
Oddsmakers cater NFL betting lines to match public perception and also to bait the public into poor bets. The temptation to use the prior year’s success as a buy sign for how a team will perform against the spread in Week 1 of the following season is an enormous trap.
The fact is, isolating road teams, road dogs, non-playoff teams vs. playoff teams, teams with a losing record or low margin vs. playoff teams or ones with a high margin from the previous year is where the line value resides. Quite simply, taking the road less traveled is your surest path to NFL betting profits.
To visit this sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com for all your Sportsbook accepts Visa needs.
|